The Democrats have used entitlement spending to create pockets of permanent dependence on government while at the same time destroying the family, co-opting leadership, and criminalizing the community. This methodology has been effectively used for decades against blacks, and it is now being used with equal effectiveness on Latinos. At the same time, Democrats also use anti-business tactics to drive out Republicans and all others who disagree with their agenda, hidden though it is.
For Democrats, poverty creation and dependence is the goal. And with the example of one group in mind, it's pretty clear exactly how all this plays out.
We are speaking about blacks, and the Democratic Party. After 50 years of solid, nearly 100% support for Democrats, such that adherence to the Democrats is reflexive in black politics, how has it all worked out? Are blacks among the wealthiest Americans, with intact families, free from from crime, with the highest education achievements and arguing that tax breaks for the wealthy are a good thing?
We know that the foregoing isn't true - the black experience under Democratic leadership has been one of shattered families, criminalized communities, government dependence at all levels, and dismal education achievement.
We also know that to even mention any of this is considered racist.
How did it all happen? How did the civil rights movement go so very bad - so very bad such that no one seriously believes any of this is going to change any time soon, if ever? Was it the Republicans who did this?
Of course it wasn't Republicans - the answer is very simple -the Democratic party put leaders in the black community who could care less about the community so long as the votes are delivered. So a relationship was created under which taxpayer funds were used to create a dependence between the community and government. One direct consequence of this was destruction of the black family, as predicted by Moynihan. But that didn't matter to black Democrat leaders - they have the votes, so what if the community was dying?
And now it's 50 years on and what we have is what you see in those flash mob videos is what the community got for all that loyalty. You satisfied with that? And at some point, you have to understand that it is all by design, that creation of the dependence was the goal, not the consequence, and that no one truly cares. Certainly not a leadership that could allow a Sharp James or Marion Barry, both of which have or will have come backs.
And what does that mean to the people involved? Tens of millions of people denied futures through following the Democratic party, toeing the party line, for decades now, and what do they have to show for it other than shattered lives, no family, except gangs since people without family will create even a twisted gang family if they have nothing else. How could this happen? Especially since the reins of power are in the hands of the leadership of the community - the Democratic party is in firm control of power in the areas where it has the votes - power and money.
It is and has been intentional - blacks repressed by the same Democratic party - the party of slavery, doing it again - for 50 years now, creating a national holocaust under the very noses of those in power. Millions denied any possible future - children - who I saw in Essex County Juvenile Court in the '90's, showing up with no one - and I bet these Dickensensian scenes are still being played out not only there but in a hundred other places.
This evil institution, which would import voters who take jobs away from the very group that gives it 100% support - by the millions and for decades now. And the media refuses to call out the Democratic party for its crimes against African Americans since to do so in their twisted mind would be to go against an institution to which they have formed their own ties.
How does this happen? How do millions of people get fooled like this? How can so many people be so blinded to what's going on? Or, more scary indeed, how can there be so many people who are committed to doing this great evil, who would sacrifice an entire group of millions of people so they can get ahead. It's one or the other, since the evil is there - to not see it is willful blindness.
And to those who say the other side - Republicans - are even worse, could you possibly imagine a worse outcome than what has happened to African Americans these last 50 years? How could it be worse than the what is going on in the ghettos? Although it isn't relevant to the discussion, you really think that somehow southern racist Dixiecrats simply changed to the Republican leadership - that southern Republicans would actually adopt those same racist views, instead of insisting, as they did, that racist Democrats drop the racism when they joined the party. (except of course, in Arkansas - where the Dixiecrats never lost power - hmmmm..) .
But even that's beside the point - the point is what the Democrats have done to blacks these last 50 years - or 150 but who is counting? You tell me how could any group have done worse than blacks over the last 50 years- this the price of giving 100% support to the Democrats. Shattered families, a criminalized community, millions in prison, no education and all the rest.
What about the future? You see any possibility of any of this getting better? I don't. No one else does, either, not seriously. Democrats won't even see that they are the problem! So it won't change - it can only get worse, and it has since the generation of grandmothers is gone. My home city - Newark, New Jersey - never changes, it just gets worse.
Somehow it finally dawned that the people running things like it just the way it is - and they make sure the media under their control never says a thing - you won't see any media going after black leadership for crimes against the community.
But one day there will be a reckoning - on how one political party destroyed an entire group, and doomed millions of its children to a life of crime and little education. Democrats - the people in control, the people that blacks give all of their support, are the problem, not the key to the solution - after 50 years how is it possible that we all don't see that? That the Democrats will never allow change since to do so would be to jeopardize their control over the community.
And the excuses - where they bother to make them anymore - are thin indeed - you see anything done by the Democrats despite having all of the power? Somehow it got to be the Republicans fault - the same people who are not within miles of the community.
So you either see it like it is and do something, are a fool, or see it and don't care, for a number of reasons, most of them corrupt.
In ten years the community will not have changed except for the worse. So what you going to do about it?
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Thursday, November 17, 2011
The Democratic Plan for America
What's being done by Democrats to make it tougher for the private sector is intentional, the aim being to drive Republicans out of certain areas and to solidify the Democratic hold on power. Any loss of population can be offset with immigration, since new immigrants tend to vote for Democrats in the very mistaken belief that Democrats favor the poor.
Therefore, calls on Democrats to do things to make the state more business friendly always fall of deaf ears - Democrats will make a show of taking this issue seriously but in the end nothing gets done. Why? Simply this - the Democratic party has nothing to gain from prosperity, since those who are most successful understand that Democrats are anti-business and vote accordingly. Why make conditions better if the result is loss of power?
As an example, take the African American experience with the Democratic Party. Since in or around 1960 African Americans have voted Democrat in overwhelming numbers. And the Democratic Party is and has been in control in virtually all of cities with large African American populations since the 1970's. In addition, hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent in anti-poverty programs aimed at improving conditions in the African American inner city communities.
Given the foregoing, if Democrats were truly interested in bettering the community, African American inner city communities should be wealthy, the population should be well educated, and there should be little or no crime. In fact of course, the opposite is true - despite being firmly in control for say 50 years, African Americans in the inner cities are subject to unbelievable amounts of crime, the education achievements are less than dismal, poverty is the rule and wealth the exception, and the African American family is in tatters with an 80% out of wedlock birth rate. All of this while at the same time, African Americans year in and year out vote close to 100% for Democrats. In fact, as shown by the NAACP, the black leadership now almost completely co-opted by and identified with the Democratic Party, upon which it depends for money and power.
At some point there has to be an understanding that all of the foregoing is is intentional, that Democrats have hit upon a formula for maintaining a huge proportion of the vote while at the same time delivering no benefit at all to the community - in fact, ensuring that the community remains poor, uneducated and the family unit non-existent. Under these circumstances one would expect that the community would look to someone else, but the Democratic lock on the media has adopted a political correctness standard under which none of the failures of the Democrats is not mentioned. In other words, don't look to a "60 Minutes" expose' of Democratic failures in the inner cities. Under the standard adopted by the Democratic media, to even mention the awful stats in the community is deemed racist.
How does the foregoing apply in other areas like California? Democratic leaders are applying the same permanent impoverishment techniques used successfully in the African American community to Latinos. And, the anti-business policies are driving Republicans out of the state. The terrible part of this is that no matter how bad economic conditions get Democrats never get the blame - the protections afforded by a firm control over most of the media ensure this, along with the usual race and ethnic baiting.
Is there any hope? Not under these circumstances. Absent an awakening by the public to the institutional corruption that has taken hold of the Democratic Party - where the party has hit upon a steady source of funding by funneling taxpayer dollars through public unions - areas in which Democrats are dominant can expect a steady economic erosion, with finger pointing at everything but the real cause.
The surprise in all of this is how Democrats have been able to get away with this all these years. How is it that no one has noticed that, despite full control by Democrats for decades, the African American community in the inner cities never achieves wealth, education and low crime, while immigrants cycle through the community? (that's another issue - how Democrats sacrificed jobs traditionally held by African Americans in order to get votes from new immigrants). The excuses of these leaders are thin indeed, along with the corruption of those in the leadership - Marion Barry, Sharp James comes to mind.
It's a negative view, but that's what we are facing.
Therefore, calls on Democrats to do things to make the state more business friendly always fall of deaf ears - Democrats will make a show of taking this issue seriously but in the end nothing gets done. Why? Simply this - the Democratic party has nothing to gain from prosperity, since those who are most successful understand that Democrats are anti-business and vote accordingly. Why make conditions better if the result is loss of power?
As an example, take the African American experience with the Democratic Party. Since in or around 1960 African Americans have voted Democrat in overwhelming numbers. And the Democratic Party is and has been in control in virtually all of cities with large African American populations since the 1970's. In addition, hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent in anti-poverty programs aimed at improving conditions in the African American inner city communities.
Given the foregoing, if Democrats were truly interested in bettering the community, African American inner city communities should be wealthy, the population should be well educated, and there should be little or no crime. In fact of course, the opposite is true - despite being firmly in control for say 50 years, African Americans in the inner cities are subject to unbelievable amounts of crime, the education achievements are less than dismal, poverty is the rule and wealth the exception, and the African American family is in tatters with an 80% out of wedlock birth rate. All of this while at the same time, African Americans year in and year out vote close to 100% for Democrats. In fact, as shown by the NAACP, the black leadership now almost completely co-opted by and identified with the Democratic Party, upon which it depends for money and power.
At some point there has to be an understanding that all of the foregoing is is intentional, that Democrats have hit upon a formula for maintaining a huge proportion of the vote while at the same time delivering no benefit at all to the community - in fact, ensuring that the community remains poor, uneducated and the family unit non-existent. Under these circumstances one would expect that the community would look to someone else, but the Democratic lock on the media has adopted a political correctness standard under which none of the failures of the Democrats is not mentioned. In other words, don't look to a "60 Minutes" expose' of Democratic failures in the inner cities. Under the standard adopted by the Democratic media, to even mention the awful stats in the community is deemed racist.
How does the foregoing apply in other areas like California? Democratic leaders are applying the same permanent impoverishment techniques used successfully in the African American community to Latinos. And, the anti-business policies are driving Republicans out of the state. The terrible part of this is that no matter how bad economic conditions get Democrats never get the blame - the protections afforded by a firm control over most of the media ensure this, along with the usual race and ethnic baiting.
Is there any hope? Not under these circumstances. Absent an awakening by the public to the institutional corruption that has taken hold of the Democratic Party - where the party has hit upon a steady source of funding by funneling taxpayer dollars through public unions - areas in which Democrats are dominant can expect a steady economic erosion, with finger pointing at everything but the real cause.
The surprise in all of this is how Democrats have been able to get away with this all these years. How is it that no one has noticed that, despite full control by Democrats for decades, the African American community in the inner cities never achieves wealth, education and low crime, while immigrants cycle through the community? (that's another issue - how Democrats sacrificed jobs traditionally held by African Americans in order to get votes from new immigrants). The excuses of these leaders are thin indeed, along with the corruption of those in the leadership - Marion Barry, Sharp James comes to mind.
It's a negative view, but that's what we are facing.
Friday, November 4, 2011
DEMOCRATIC MEDIA MANIPULATION AND THE REAL CAUSE OF POVERTY
It is a wonder how the Democrats manage a seamless integration with the media that supports them - and the public never catches on to the way this works. Remember homelessness? That was the driving issue during the Reagan era - for awhile it was all we heard from the traditional press. This campaign was part of the overall Democratic demonization of Reagan as being unsympathetic to the poor.
But, what happened to the homeless? Did they disappear? No, what happened is Clinton - with the election of Bill Clinton all of the references to poor suddenly stopped. The media no longer had a need to describe the country as a place overrun by homeless people. Happy days were here again!
Now with Democratic strategy focused on painting Republicans as the servants of the wealthy, the focus is on "income disparity." And the Democratic media is playing its part with story after story on this issue.
The assertion is, of course, nonsensical, on may levels. First, the plight of the "poor" is consistently overstated by the Democratic media. Want proof? The Census Bureau, which was brought under Obama Administration control a few years ago, was just compelled to release a report showing that poverty in the US has been substantially exaggerated. Under prior reports, programs such as food stamps and tax credits, which together delivered $221 billion across the country last year, were not calculated. Ridiculous, right? When these programs are calculated the "poor" are not very poor at all.
And just what makes the "poor" poor? Democrats make it a point to ignore the 40% out of wedlock births in the United States as the cause of anything. Half of all births in the Latino community are to single mothers. For African Americans is closer to 80%. Daniel Patrick Moynihan in 1965 and later in 1974 warned that births to single mothers would result in high crime rates, poor performance in school, and high unemployment, Back then, 24% of African American births were to single mothers. Today the illegitimacy rate for white women is 28%. Moynahan wrote, "A community that allows a large number of men to grow up in broken families, dominated by women, never acquiring any stable relationship with male authority, never acquiring rational expectations about the future — that community asks for and gets chaos."
Those concerned about rising financial inequality need to look at the actual causes. What is new is a rapidly metastasising underclass, the result, not of exploitative capitalism, but of Democratic policies meant to ensure the existence of a permanent class of dependent people, forever demanding money and voting for Democrats who deliver it. Democratic support for single motherhood, and the failure to recognize its utter destructiveness of society at large has incapacitated the lowest third of the population. It is largely unsocialized, and uneducable. Addicted to drugs and govt handouts, this mass of the congenitally poor explains the widening gap between our healthy middle class and America's underbelly. it is a situation that is patently acceptable to the Democratic party which profits by the willingness of those involved to vote for the very people who ensure that they remain exactly where they are. this includes African Americans, whose community has been destroyed by Democratic policies, and who have no chance of escaping the endless cycle of poverty that grips it. For African Americans it is a modern day holocaust, caused by the very people into whose hands they have placed themselves, in a misinformed effort to improve their lot during the civil rights era.
The problem is not with the rich up above. It is with the professors and politicians and professional moralizers who have cultivated this disaster, and from the Democratic Party who have profited by it.
One day this disaster will be common knowledge, along with those who caused it. When that day comes the Democratic party will be called upon to answer for its crimes against the African American community.
But, what happened to the homeless? Did they disappear? No, what happened is Clinton - with the election of Bill Clinton all of the references to poor suddenly stopped. The media no longer had a need to describe the country as a place overrun by homeless people. Happy days were here again!
Now with Democratic strategy focused on painting Republicans as the servants of the wealthy, the focus is on "income disparity." And the Democratic media is playing its part with story after story on this issue.
The assertion is, of course, nonsensical, on may levels. First, the plight of the "poor" is consistently overstated by the Democratic media. Want proof? The Census Bureau, which was brought under Obama Administration control a few years ago, was just compelled to release a report showing that poverty in the US has been substantially exaggerated. Under prior reports, programs such as food stamps and tax credits, which together delivered $221 billion across the country last year, were not calculated. Ridiculous, right? When these programs are calculated the "poor" are not very poor at all.
And just what makes the "poor" poor? Democrats make it a point to ignore the 40% out of wedlock births in the United States as the cause of anything. Half of all births in the Latino community are to single mothers. For African Americans is closer to 80%. Daniel Patrick Moynihan in 1965 and later in 1974 warned that births to single mothers would result in high crime rates, poor performance in school, and high unemployment, Back then, 24% of African American births were to single mothers. Today the illegitimacy rate for white women is 28%. Moynahan wrote, "A community that allows a large number of men to grow up in broken families, dominated by women, never acquiring any stable relationship with male authority, never acquiring rational expectations about the future — that community asks for and gets chaos."
Those concerned about rising financial inequality need to look at the actual causes. What is new is a rapidly metastasising underclass, the result, not of exploitative capitalism, but of Democratic policies meant to ensure the existence of a permanent class of dependent people, forever demanding money and voting for Democrats who deliver it. Democratic support for single motherhood, and the failure to recognize its utter destructiveness of society at large has incapacitated the lowest third of the population. It is largely unsocialized, and uneducable. Addicted to drugs and govt handouts, this mass of the congenitally poor explains the widening gap between our healthy middle class and America's underbelly. it is a situation that is patently acceptable to the Democratic party which profits by the willingness of those involved to vote for the very people who ensure that they remain exactly where they are. this includes African Americans, whose community has been destroyed by Democratic policies, and who have no chance of escaping the endless cycle of poverty that grips it. For African Americans it is a modern day holocaust, caused by the very people into whose hands they have placed themselves, in a misinformed effort to improve their lot during the civil rights era.
The problem is not with the rich up above. It is with the professors and politicians and professional moralizers who have cultivated this disaster, and from the Democratic Party who have profited by it.
One day this disaster will be common knowledge, along with those who caused it. When that day comes the Democratic party will be called upon to answer for its crimes against the African American community.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
The Media at It Again
Notice how the articles on the various Occupy Wall Street protest never say how many protestors there are? When the Tea Party had rallies in 2009 and 2010 the media was obsessed with numbers, and a hundred thousand was the norm. Now that Occupy whatever manages to get small numbers of people (the only estimates: Los Angeles - 43 people, Oakland, 300) we never get crowd estimates. Do you know how many people are in these protests? Relatively few, especially in comparison with the enormous amount of coverage.
Typical media bias. Would the press pay that much attention to Tea Party rallies? We had a similar amount of people at our last Tea Party rally and got no mention in the national press.
Also no mention of the fact that the owner of Zucotti park - which is the only entity that can toss out the protesters, got a huge grant from the Obama Administration for wind farms. And Biden talked about an explosion of discontentment right before the Occupy movement started.
So we have a movement planned, executed and carried through by the Obama Administration, with no press interest in investigating any of this.
You people like being played? Isn't this a good reason to distrust the traditional media?
Typical media bias. Would the press pay that much attention to Tea Party rallies? We had a similar amount of people at our last Tea Party rally and got no mention in the national press.
Also no mention of the fact that the owner of Zucotti park - which is the only entity that can toss out the protesters, got a huge grant from the Obama Administration for wind farms. And Biden talked about an explosion of discontentment right before the Occupy movement started.
So we have a movement planned, executed and carried through by the Obama Administration, with no press interest in investigating any of this.
You people like being played? Isn't this a good reason to distrust the traditional media?
Thursday, October 6, 2011
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND 50 YEARS OF REPRESSION
Now that Obama has lost the independent voters, of whom 41% now strongly believe Obama is doing a bad job of being President, and a much greater percentage who say they wouldn't vote for him. He's also lost the white vote two to one, and racism isn't the reason - it is Obama's politics and leadership that re the problem. Obama's losing the Latino vote as well, as Latinos wise up to the fact that the ruin the Democratic party wreaked on the African American community is planned for them as well.
Obama still has the African American vote in outsize numbers but at last he is starting to show weakness there was well. More and more African Americans are coming to understand that the party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow hasn't changed that much. In fact, Democratic Senators elected and re-elected a former member of the KKK to Senate leadership position in the 70's, 80's and 90's- someone who refused to join the military because he would be serving alongside African Americans, someone who was praised by the KKK for increasing membership and who was in the KKK through his mid-twenties. We are talking about Robert Byrd, of course, and who is to say that this man was ever repentant for all the evil things he did? Certainly no Republican would ever be allowed to serve with his record - wouldn't you call that a double standard?
And it wasn't Republican governor's that stood in the doorways of schools preventing black children from getting in.
Democrats have now held almost complete sway in the African American communities for well over 50 years. Their record isn't pretty. Waves of immigrants go through the cities - allowed in in order to have more Democratic votes - the same people who took jobs and benefits meant for black Americans. You think there is support in the black community for immigration? And you would think that a party interested in helping the black community and getting close to 100% loyalty in return wouldn't allow that to happen.
Democratic media - the national or traditional media has a policy in place - political correctness - under which we can't even know how bad it is in the black community since to do so would be to make black Democratic politicians look bad. And black Democratic leaders get rich in the poverty industry - you would have to be blind not to see it. No matter how bad it gets, no matter that the black family has been progressively destroyed by Democratic policies - these people get elected over and over again. And when Republicans were finally making inroads in 2005 your paper along with others manufactured a scandal out of the response to Katrina. That was, after all, what it was all about.
It is said that Republicans never make an effort to talk to the black community. Well any effort they do make is scoffed at, they are accused of being racist etc. It's a two way street, and if you like the corruption and cronyism that is the hallmark of today's cities then let it stay the way it is.
But how many years of failure does it take for people to wake up to the fact that their so-called friends - even those in the leadership positions - are their bitter enemies?
Guess what you see in those flash mob videos? THAT is the legacy of years and years and years of Democrat Party control over the black community. And the Party likes things just the way they are- after all - why change since Democrats get all the votes. For the Democratic party conditions in the black community are perfect, and should not be changed one bit. Want an education - go to Essex County New Jersey Juvenile Court and watch as children cycle through the system - black children without so much as a grandmother to stand up for them. This is an area that has been controlled by Democrats for over a century, and where enormous amounts of money get collected, and simply disappears. This is the legacy of the Democratic Party for the black community - the worst mistake it could have made ca. 1965, embracing this organization of racists, thieves and murderers.
And, sorry to say there are people in the media who should know better want more of the same. How many more years of failure will it take for the community to wake up to the fact that they have been used, abused, mistreated, stepped on by an organization that has no intention of doing anything other than what they have been doing for 150 years or so.
Obama still has the African American vote in outsize numbers but at last he is starting to show weakness there was well. More and more African Americans are coming to understand that the party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow hasn't changed that much. In fact, Democratic Senators elected and re-elected a former member of the KKK to Senate leadership position in the 70's, 80's and 90's- someone who refused to join the military because he would be serving alongside African Americans, someone who was praised by the KKK for increasing membership and who was in the KKK through his mid-twenties. We are talking about Robert Byrd, of course, and who is to say that this man was ever repentant for all the evil things he did? Certainly no Republican would ever be allowed to serve with his record - wouldn't you call that a double standard?
And it wasn't Republican governor's that stood in the doorways of schools preventing black children from getting in.
Democrats have now held almost complete sway in the African American communities for well over 50 years. Their record isn't pretty. Waves of immigrants go through the cities - allowed in in order to have more Democratic votes - the same people who took jobs and benefits meant for black Americans. You think there is support in the black community for immigration? And you would think that a party interested in helping the black community and getting close to 100% loyalty in return wouldn't allow that to happen.
Democratic media - the national or traditional media has a policy in place - political correctness - under which we can't even know how bad it is in the black community since to do so would be to make black Democratic politicians look bad. And black Democratic leaders get rich in the poverty industry - you would have to be blind not to see it. No matter how bad it gets, no matter that the black family has been progressively destroyed by Democratic policies - these people get elected over and over again. And when Republicans were finally making inroads in 2005 your paper along with others manufactured a scandal out of the response to Katrina. That was, after all, what it was all about.
It is said that Republicans never make an effort to talk to the black community. Well any effort they do make is scoffed at, they are accused of being racist etc. It's a two way street, and if you like the corruption and cronyism that is the hallmark of today's cities then let it stay the way it is.
But how many years of failure does it take for people to wake up to the fact that their so-called friends - even those in the leadership positions - are their bitter enemies?
Guess what you see in those flash mob videos? THAT is the legacy of years and years and years of Democrat Party control over the black community. And the Party likes things just the way they are- after all - why change since Democrats get all the votes. For the Democratic party conditions in the black community are perfect, and should not be changed one bit. Want an education - go to Essex County New Jersey Juvenile Court and watch as children cycle through the system - black children without so much as a grandmother to stand up for them. This is an area that has been controlled by Democrats for over a century, and where enormous amounts of money get collected, and simply disappears. This is the legacy of the Democratic Party for the black community - the worst mistake it could have made ca. 1965, embracing this organization of racists, thieves and murderers.
And, sorry to say there are people in the media who should know better want more of the same. How many more years of failure will it take for the community to wake up to the fact that they have been used, abused, mistreated, stepped on by an organization that has no intention of doing anything other than what they have been doing for 150 years or so.
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE POLITICS OF MISERY
California is yet another example of what happens when Democrats take control of anything these days. The Democratic Party has transformed itself into something that is among the most corrupt organizations on the planet. It has embraced its dark side - the party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow and lynchings is now in the business of destroying communities.
As an organization the Democratic Party is institutionally corrupt, relying on taxpayer dollars funneled through public unions. It ruins everything it touches. California is in the hands of this organization which after it seizes power (usually by using its power within the national media to sharply define groups and then turning each group against the other) uses government to drive out all those who disagree with its vision of turning the populace into dependents, by destroying the family, and subsidizing children out of the traditional family structure. Thus have Democrats transformed American cities from engines of growth and wealth to a drag on the communities around them - and has utterly destroyed African Americans in so doing.
Latinos take note - you are next.
Democrats have turned its corrupt vision on the whole of California and the "povertization" of the people is the goal, not the result of Democrat policies. A populace that is poor, fearful, dependent and broke is THE perfect Democrat Party society. Democrats would have everyone believe that these are the consequences under which Democrats take control, but that is belied by the facts - which are that these are not consequences but results of such control. Once in power Democrats use taxes to set up sham 'community' entities to distribute money throughout its organization, in the process doing exactly nothing for the community it rules.
For over 50 years now this post civil rights era system of governance has been perfected in the major cities - and the African American community has borne the full brunt of the Democrat Party experience in governance, and the absolute corruption of the one party system in control of most of today's inner cities. That model of government is in the process of being implemented on a state-wide basis in California. Don't expect what is typically known as wise government from Democrats - the party has an entirely different agenda in mind, including driving out those who disagree.
Think this is paranoia? Continue to watch events unfold in California, and note that no matter how bad it gets, no matter how much poverty, how much crime, how much misery, Democrats will never admit that there is anything wrong with their theories of how to run things. It is always something external, since Democrats cannot admit being wrong. There are different rules at work here, and the destruction of the work of the past is strictly intended in the gloomy new future envisioned by the corrupt leaders of the Democratic Party.
As an organization the Democratic Party is institutionally corrupt, relying on taxpayer dollars funneled through public unions. It ruins everything it touches. California is in the hands of this organization which after it seizes power (usually by using its power within the national media to sharply define groups and then turning each group against the other) uses government to drive out all those who disagree with its vision of turning the populace into dependents, by destroying the family, and subsidizing children out of the traditional family structure. Thus have Democrats transformed American cities from engines of growth and wealth to a drag on the communities around them - and has utterly destroyed African Americans in so doing.
Latinos take note - you are next.
Democrats have turned its corrupt vision on the whole of California and the "povertization" of the people is the goal, not the result of Democrat policies. A populace that is poor, fearful, dependent and broke is THE perfect Democrat Party society. Democrats would have everyone believe that these are the consequences under which Democrats take control, but that is belied by the facts - which are that these are not consequences but results of such control. Once in power Democrats use taxes to set up sham 'community' entities to distribute money throughout its organization, in the process doing exactly nothing for the community it rules.
For over 50 years now this post civil rights era system of governance has been perfected in the major cities - and the African American community has borne the full brunt of the Democrat Party experience in governance, and the absolute corruption of the one party system in control of most of today's inner cities. That model of government is in the process of being implemented on a state-wide basis in California. Don't expect what is typically known as wise government from Democrats - the party has an entirely different agenda in mind, including driving out those who disagree.
Think this is paranoia? Continue to watch events unfold in California, and note that no matter how bad it gets, no matter how much poverty, how much crime, how much misery, Democrats will never admit that there is anything wrong with their theories of how to run things. It is always something external, since Democrats cannot admit being wrong. There are different rules at work here, and the destruction of the work of the past is strictly intended in the gloomy new future envisioned by the corrupt leaders of the Democratic Party.
THE NATIONAL MEDIA DOUBLE STANDARD
Nothing like the "National Media" - their biases are such that if Chris Christie had a "D" after his name, he would be considered "scrappy" and "tough" a "Trumanesque" buck stops here kind of guy. Sort of the same way that Biden is considered "cute" instead of being a moron which is how people like you would consider him if he had an "R" after his name.
Same thing for Obama - a Republican with friends like Obama has, a pastor like Obama had, and a record like Obama's would never have come near the Presidency. We would have had howls of protest.
It's a double standard, although why the national or traditional media insists on being affiliated with the 18% who call themselves liberal instead of the 41% who identify as conservatives. It sure would sell lots more papers and Time and Newsweek would maybe be profitable.
But, that's where we are - for the national media Republicans come in two flavors - stupid or evil, and Democrats are always smart, sophisticated, their errors always excusable or the result of good intentions. This despite the terrible history of the Democratic party as the party of slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings and all the rest, and not only in the south. Even Senator Byrd, a card carrying member of the KKK - and not just in his youth - was elected to leadership positions by his fellow Senators through the 70's and 80's.
In short, how does the national media live with the hypocrisy? How is it they have such willful blindness? How can the national media excuse the terrible things Democrats have done to African Americans over the last 150 years - and are still doing today, what with the Democrat destruction of the black family as a result of welfare policies, the enforced silence about it in a policy called political correctness, and the importation of millions of immigrants who took jobs and benefits traditionally done or meant for African Americans. And then they accuse REPUBLICANS of racism?
And Democrats are working on doing the same thing to Latinos that they have done to blacks - so that not one but two groups will be under the boot heel of government. This is 50 years for blacks, and Latinos will now get more of the same - multi-generational misery cynically disguised.
How can they do it?
Same thing for Obama - a Republican with friends like Obama has, a pastor like Obama had, and a record like Obama's would never have come near the Presidency. We would have had howls of protest.
It's a double standard, although why the national or traditional media insists on being affiliated with the 18% who call themselves liberal instead of the 41% who identify as conservatives. It sure would sell lots more papers and Time and Newsweek would maybe be profitable.
But, that's where we are - for the national media Republicans come in two flavors - stupid or evil, and Democrats are always smart, sophisticated, their errors always excusable or the result of good intentions. This despite the terrible history of the Democratic party as the party of slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings and all the rest, and not only in the south. Even Senator Byrd, a card carrying member of the KKK - and not just in his youth - was elected to leadership positions by his fellow Senators through the 70's and 80's.
In short, how does the national media live with the hypocrisy? How is it they have such willful blindness? How can the national media excuse the terrible things Democrats have done to African Americans over the last 150 years - and are still doing today, what with the Democrat destruction of the black family as a result of welfare policies, the enforced silence about it in a policy called political correctness, and the importation of millions of immigrants who took jobs and benefits traditionally done or meant for African Americans. And then they accuse REPUBLICANS of racism?
And Democrats are working on doing the same thing to Latinos that they have done to blacks - so that not one but two groups will be under the boot heel of government. This is 50 years for blacks, and Latinos will now get more of the same - multi-generational misery cynically disguised.
How can they do it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)