Here in New Jersey, we residents live subject to the decrees of our
Supreme Court, which rules in ways that bear similarity to Alice in
Wonderland. For example, the Court's Abbott decision is not applicable
to ALL poor districts, but only the 17 or so "Abbott Districts." Why do
these particular school districts get the benefit of extreme state
largess and no others? Because they were the ones that were in the
original suit - LUCKY! Make sense? Of course not, even assuming that the
Abbott decisions make any kind of sense, which they certainly do not.
Most important, having adopted the
simplistic formula that equates education with money, the self appointed
rules of the kingdom of New Jersey have put the squeeze on, and the
results haven't been pretty. I recall working with the New Jersey School
Construction Corporation - the so-called experts in this agency simply
forgot that part of the expense of building a school included land
acquisition! Alice in Wonderland indeed - six billion spent and not much
to show for it - in fact, land purchased by the SCC is still laying
vacant waiting for schools that will never be built. The law of
unintended consequences strikes again, as it has with everything the
Court does.
Plus, the guiding principle of the Court has been to see everything from
the Democratic left - the very liberal left, which believes government can
solve any problem. Thus, and not mentioned is that the Court has never
seen an environmental law that it didn't like and wouldn't uphold, no
matter what the impact on property ownership. Thus the Court has upheld
laws that have made it impossible to use land, but it also has made it
functionally impossible to make a claim of regulatory takings -
requiring not only that the laws and regulations leave the owner with no
value whatsoever, but also that the owner go through the time and
expense of having a development plan rejected, again and again. In the
process, the Court has upheld laws that placed huge areas of the
Republican part of New Jersey off limits to development, thus ensuring
that the power stays in the Democratic urban areas.
The Court has adopted rulings that affect every area of life, from, as
pointed out, zoning and education, but also reproductive health, going
even further than Roe v, Wade. Every time the Court usurps another area
given by the Constitution to the legislature, the people lose more
liberty - there being no appeal from the real rulers of New Jersey.
The people of New Jersey have, of course,
voted with their feet - even massive immigration didn't prevent the
state from losing another Congressional seat after the last census. It
is a trend likely to continue here in the Kingdom of the New Jersey
Supreme Court.
No comments:
Post a Comment