Tuesday, October 25, 2011

The Media at It Again

Notice how the articles on the various Occupy Wall Street protest never say how many protestors there are? When the Tea Party had rallies in 2009 and 2010 the media was obsessed with numbers, and a hundred thousand was the norm. Now that Occupy whatever manages to get small numbers of people (the only estimates: Los Angeles - 43 people, Oakland, 300) we never get crowd estimates.  Do you know how many people are in these protests?  Relatively few, especially in comparison with the enormous amount of coverage. 

Typical media bias. Would the press pay that much attention to Tea Party rallies? We had a similar amount of people at our last Tea Party rally and got no mention in the national press.

Also no mention of the fact that the owner of Zucotti park - which is the only entity that can toss out the protesters, got a huge grant from the Obama Administration for wind farms. And Biden talked about an explosion of discontentment right before the Occupy movement started.

So we have a movement planned, executed and carried through by the Obama Administration, with no press interest in investigating any of this.

You people like being played?  Isn't this a good reason to distrust the traditional media?

Thursday, October 6, 2011


Now that Obama has lost the independent voters, of whom 41% now strongly believe Obama is doing a bad job of being President, and a much greater percentage who say they wouldn't vote for him.  He's also  lost the white vote two to one, and racism isn't the reason - it is Obama's politics and leadership that re the  problem.  Obama's losing the Latino vote as well, as Latinos wise up to the fact that the ruin the Democratic party wreaked on the African American community is planned for them as well.

Obama still has the African American vote in outsize numbers but at last he is starting to show weakness there was well.  More and more African Americans are coming to understand that the party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow hasn't changed that much. In fact, Democratic Senators elected and re-elected a former member of the KKK to Senate leadership position in the 70's, 80's and 90's- someone who refused to join the military because he would  be serving alongside African Americans, someone who was praised by the KKK for increasing membership and who was in the KKK through his mid-twenties.  We are talking about Robert Byrd, of course, and who is to say that this man was ever repentant for all the evil things he did? Certainly no Republican would ever be allowed to serve with his record - wouldn't you call that a double standard?

And it wasn't Republican governor's that stood in the doorways of schools preventing black children from getting in. 

Democrats have now held almost complete sway in the African American communities for well over 50 years. Their record isn't pretty.  Waves of immigrants go through the cities - allowed in in order to have more Democratic votes - the same people who took jobs and benefits meant for black Americans. You think there is support in the black community for immigration?  And you would think that a party interested in helping the black community and getting close to 100% loyalty in return wouldn't allow that to happen.

Democratic media - the national or traditional media has a policy in place - political correctness - under which we can't even know how bad it is in the black community since to do so would be to make black Democratic politicians look bad. And black Democratic leaders get rich in the poverty industry - you would have to be blind not to see it.  No matter how bad it gets, no matter that the black family has been progressively destroyed by Democratic policies - these people get elected over and over again. And when Republicans were finally making inroads in 2005 your paper along with others manufactured a scandal out of the response to Katrina.  That was, after all, what it was all about.

It is said that Republicans never make an effort to talk to the black community. Well any effort they do make is scoffed at, they are accused of being racist etc.  It's a two way street, and if you like the corruption and cronyism that is the hallmark of today's cities then let it stay the way it is.

But how many years of failure does it take for people to wake up to the fact that their so-called friends - even those in the leadership positions - are their bitter enemies? 

Guess what you see in those flash mob videos?  THAT is the legacy of years and years and years of Democrat Party control over the black community. And the Party likes things just the way they are- after all - why change since Democrats get all the votes. For the Democratic party conditions in the black community are perfect, and should not be changed one bit. Want an education - go to Essex County New Jersey Juvenile Court and watch as children cycle through the system - black children without so much as a grandmother to stand up for them. This is an area that has been controlled by Democrats for over a century, and where enormous amounts of money get collected, and simply disappears. This is the legacy of the Democratic Party for the black community - the worst mistake it could have made ca. 1965, embracing this organization of racists, thieves and murderers.

And, sorry to say there are people in the media who should know better  want more of the same.  How many more years of failure will it take for the community to wake up to the fact that they have been used, abused, mistreated, stepped on by an organization that has no intention of doing anything other than what they have been doing for 150 years or so.

Tuesday, October 4, 2011


California is yet another example of what happens when Democrats take control of anything these days. The Democratic Party has transformed itself into something that is among the most corrupt organizations on the planet.  It has embraced its dark side - the party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow and lynchings is now in the business of destroying communities.

As an organization the Democratic Party is institutionally corrupt, relying on taxpayer dollars funneled through public unions. It ruins everything it touches. California is in the hands of this organization which after it seizes power (usually by using its power within the national media to sharply define groups and then turning each group against the other) uses government to drive out all those who disagree with its vision of turning the populace into dependents, by destroying the family, and subsidizing children out of the traditional family structure. Thus have Democrats transformed American cities from engines of growth and wealth to a drag on the communities around them - and has utterly destroyed African Americans in so doing.

Latinos take note - you are next.

Democrats have turned its corrupt vision on the whole of California and the "povertization" of the people is the goal, not the result of Democrat policies. A populace that is poor, fearful, dependent and broke is THE perfect Democrat Party society.   Democrats would have everyone believe that these are the consequences under which Democrats take control, but that is belied by the facts - which are that these are not consequences but results of such control. Once in power Democrats use taxes to set up sham 'community' entities to distribute money throughout its organization, in the process doing exactly nothing for the community it rules.

For over 50 years now this post civil rights era system of governance has been perfected in the major cities - and the African American community has borne the full brunt of the Democrat Party experience in governance, and the absolute corruption of the one party system in control of most of today's inner cities. That model of government is in the process of being implemented on a state-wide basis in California.  Don't expect what is typically known as wise government from Democrats - the party has an entirely different agenda in mind, including driving out those who disagree.

Think this is paranoia? Continue to watch events unfold in California, and note that no matter how bad it gets, no matter how much poverty, how much crime, how much misery, Democrats will never admit that there is anything wrong with their theories of how to run things. It is always something external, since Democrats cannot admit being wrong.  There are different rules at work here, and the destruction of the work of the past is strictly intended in the gloomy new future envisioned by the corrupt leaders of the Democratic Party.


Nothing like the "National Media" - their biases are such that if Chris Christie had a "D" after his name, he would be considered "scrappy" and "tough" a "Trumanesque" buck stops here kind of guy. Sort of the same way that Biden is considered "cute" instead of being a moron which is how people like you would consider him if he had an "R" after his name.

Same thing for Obama - a Republican with friends like Obama has, a pastor like Obama had, and a record like Obama's would never have come near the Presidency.  We would have had howls of protest.

It's a double standard, although why the national or traditional media insists on being affiliated with the 18% who call themselves liberal instead of the 41% who identify as conservatives.  It sure would sell lots more papers and Time and Newsweek would maybe be profitable.

But, that's where we are - for the national media Republicans come in two flavors - stupid or evil, and Democrats are always smart, sophisticated, their errors always excusable or the result of good intentions.  This despite the terrible history of the Democratic party as the party of slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings and all the rest, and not only in the south. Even Senator Byrd, a card carrying member of the KKK - and not just in his youth - was elected to leadership positions by his fellow Senators through the 70's and 80's.

In short, how does the national media live with the hypocrisy? How is it they have such willful blindness? How can the national media excuse the terrible things Democrats have done to African Americans over the last 150 years - and are still doing today, what with the Democrat destruction of the black family as a result of welfare policies, the enforced silence about it in a policy called political correctness, and the importation of millions of immigrants who took jobs and benefits traditionally done or meant for African Americans.   And then they accuse REPUBLICANS of racism?  

And Democrats are working on doing the same thing to Latinos that they have done to blacks - so that not one but two groups will be under the boot heel of government.  This is 50 years for blacks, and Latinos will now get more of the same - multi-generational misery cynically disguised.

How can they do it?